Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2003-05-19 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2003-05-19 House Journal Page 1934 SB 26 The following was read the second time: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 26(STA) "An Act relating to state employees who are called to active duty as reserve or auxiliary members of the armed forces of the United States; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page STA RPT 3DP 1NR 1829 FN1: INDETERMINATE(ADM/ALL DEPTS) 1829 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that CSSB 26(STA) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSSB 26(STA) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSSB 26(STA) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 26(STA) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 32 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Anderson, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Wilson, Wolf Excused: Croft, Joule, Kapsner, Meyer 2003-05-19 House Journal Page 1935 Absent: Berkowitz, Harris, Moses, Williams And so, CSSB 26(STA) passed the House. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Kerttula gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on CSSB 26(STA). Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration of CSSB 26(STA) be taken up on the same day. There being no objection, it was so ordered. SB 26 The following was again before the House in third reading: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 26(STA) "An Act relating to state employees who are called to active duty as reserve or auxiliary members of the armed forces of the United States; and providing for an effective date." The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CSSB 26(STA) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 26(STA)--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 32 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Fate, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Wilson, Wolf Excused: Croft, Joule, Kapsner, Meyer 2003-05-19 House Journal Page 1936 Absent: Foster, Harris, Moses, Williams And so, CSSB 26(STA) passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSSB 26(STA) was signed by the Speaker and Chief Clerk and returned to the Senate.